EVENT>Wednesday Afternoon Pairs|SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 4, 2015   |CLUB NO.>266577    | 02/04/2015 16:07
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Robert I. Eachus|RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   72.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>None/500/300   |CLUB>Tom Cheetham Nashua Dupli
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Barry Rogoff           William Nason            A    2     .     .     79.08  54.92  0.56(A)
 2 Lorri Erion            John Oswald              C    .     .     .     57.75  40.10
 3 Ross Huntington        Don Rivard               C    .     .     2     70.92  49.25  0.22(C)
 4 Paul Levesque          Suzanna Thurber          B    3     2     .     76.08  52.83  0.40(A)
 5 John Banker            Robert Leese             A    .     .     .     74.58  51.79
 6 Carol Leblanc          Dorothy Schulte          C    .     .     .     61.60  42.78
 7 Stephen Singer         Elma Vaidya              C    1     1     1     84.58  58.74  0.80(A)


                                          Totals                         504.59
EVENT>Wednesday Afternoon Pairs|SESSION>Wednesday Aft|SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 4, 2015   |CLUB NO.>266577    | 02/04/2015 16:07
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Robert I. Eachus|RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   72.0 |TOP>   6 |MP LIMITS>None/500/300   |CLUB>Tom Cheetham Nashua Dupli
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Benson Ho              Sarah Widhu              A    1     .     .     89.05  61.84  0.80(A)
 2 Roberta Yaffe          Richard Letizia          B    .    2/3    .     69.62  48.35  0.24(B)
 3 Marshall Thomas        Krystyna Ciesluk         A    3     .     .     70.86  49.21  0.40(A)
 4 Robert Sayre           James Garvey             C    .     .     .     65.62  45.57
 5 Paul Arsenault         Juanita Dangel           C    .    2/3    2     69.62  48.35  0.24(B)
 6 William Landis         Thomas Provost Sr        A    .     .     .     69.43  48.22
 7 Robert Fucile          Mo Gaudette              C    .     .     .     64.69  44.92
 8 Janice Wiegman         Cornelia Cockrell        C    2     1     1     77.81  54.03  0.56(A)

                                          Totals                         576.70

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A 4 2
10 9 7 6
Q J 8 6
J 6
K 8 3
K J 3 2
10 5 3 2
10 4
N
WE
S
Q 9 7 5
A 5 4
A 4
A Q 9 5
8
7    16
9
J 10 6
Q 8
K 9 7
K 8 7 3 2

EW 3; EW 2; EW 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1NTE31905.500.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 1-Ho-Widhu
1NTE31905.500.505-Banker-Leese vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
2E321104.002.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2E331402.503.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3WJ31402.503.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
1NTE741801.005.002-Erion-Oswald vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3NTEJ34000.006.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 8 3
A J 8 7
K J 8 4 3
8
K 9 6
K 6 4
Q 10 5 2
J 10 5
N
WE
S
A 7 5 4 2
Q 5 3
9
K Q 9 7
10
9    11
10
Q 10
10 9 2
A 7 6
A 6 4 3 2

EW 2; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1N; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4EA−31506.000.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3N931104.501.502-Erion-Oswald vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
2N331104.501.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
PassPass3.003.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2E1021101.005.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 1-Ho-Widhu
2E1021101.005.005-Banker-Leese vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
2EA21101.005.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 10 8 5 3 2
A 6 3
J 9 8
6
A J 4
9 4
10 2
10 8 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
Q 9 7
Q J 10 5
A 6 5 3
Q 9
8
5    11
16
6
K 8 7 2
K Q 7 4
A K J 7

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; Par +400

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3NTS254606.000.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3NTS434005.001.002-Erion-Oswald vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3NQ31404.002.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
2NTS921202.503.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 1-Ho-Widhu
2NTS421202.503.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
4NQ−1500.505.505-Banker-Leese vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTS4−1500.505.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 4-Sayre-Garvey

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
6 4 3
A J 7 5
A J 7 4
Q 9
K Q J 8 5
6 4 2
10 8
J 8 3
N
WE
S
10 9
K Q 8 3
Q 9 3
10 7 5 2
12
7    7
14
A 7 2
10 9
K 6 5 2
A K 6 4

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 2; NS 3; Par +600

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2NTSK21205.001.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
1NTSK21205.001.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
2NTSK21205.001.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
2SK2903.003.005-Banker-Leese vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3NTSK−11002.004.002-Erion-Oswald vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTSK−22000.505.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTSK−22000.505.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 5
Q 10 6 5 3 2
A J 3
A 8
Q 10 4
A 9 8 7
Q 10 8 7 6
6
N
WE
S
8 6 2
K J 4
5
10 9 7 5 4 2
12
8    4
16
A K 9 7 3
K 9 4 2
K Q J 3

NS 5; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; NS 2; Par +650

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3NTS777206.000.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTN266905.001.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
5S656504.002.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
3NTN546303.003.002-Erion-Oswald vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTS736001.504.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3NTN1036001.504.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
4N5−22000.006.005-Banker-Leese vs 1-Ho-Widhu

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A Q J 10 9 5
J 7 4 2
3
9 4
K 8 7 4 3
K
A J 5
A K J 6
N
WE
S
6
Q 10 6
10 8 6 4
Q 10 7 5 2
8
19    4
9
2
A 9 8 5 3
K Q 9 7 2
8 3

EW 3N; EW 4; NS 2; EW 2; Par −300: NS 4×−2

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2×W2−38006.000.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
1W3−22005.001.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
2N621104.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 1-Ho-Widhu
1N21803.003.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3SA−1501.504.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
4SK−1501.504.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
4SA−31500.006.002-Erion-Oswald vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 7
A 7 6 3 2
Q 3
A K J 5
A 5 4
Q 10 5
10 9 5
8 7 6 4
N
WE
S
J 10 3
J 9 8
A J 8 7 4
9 3
16
6    7
11
K 9 8 6 2
K 4
K 6 2
Q 10 2

NS 4; NS 4; NS 3N; NS 5; NS 1; Par +620

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3NTS856605.500.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3NTS856605.500.504-Levesque-Thurber vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3NTS846304.002.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3N941703.003.002-Erion-Oswald vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3NTS10−11001.005.005-Banker-Leese vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
4S8−11001.005.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTS5−11001.005.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 4-Sayre-Garvey

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A 10 9 4
10 5 4 3
Q 10 8 3
9
K Q 6
8
A J 9 4 2
A 10 6 3
N
WE
S
8 7 3
A J 9 7
K
K Q 8 4 2
6
14    13
7
J 5 2
K Q 6 2
7 6 5
J 7 5

EW 6; EW 3N; EW 2; EW 3; W 1; Par −920

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5E5−1505.500.505-Banker-Leese vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTE5−1505.500.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
3NTW934003.003.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
5W354003.003.002-Erion-Oswald vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3NTW434003.003.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
5WA64201.005.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3NTW454600.006.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
3 2
J 4
K Q J 10
9 8 7 5 4
Q J 6 5
A 9
A 9 7 5
10 6 3
N
WE
S
K 10 8 7
Q 10 6 5 3
3
K Q J
7
11    11
11
A 9 4
K 8 7 2
8 6 4 2
A 2

EW 4; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −620

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4WK−11005.500.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
4WK−11005.500.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
1EA21104.002.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3WK31403.003.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
3WK41702.004.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
4EA46200.505.502-Erion-Oswald vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4WK46200.505.505-Banker-Leese vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A K 7 5 4 2
5 4 2
8
A 4 2
J 6 3
K
A K 10 7
K Q 10 5 3
N
WE
S
10
A Q J 8 6
J 6 4
J 9 8 7
11
16    9
4
Q 9 8
10 9 7 3
Q 9 5 3 2
6

EW 3; EW 4; NS 2; EW 3; S 1N; Par −140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4E8−44006.000.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4E6−33005.001.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3WA41304.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3WK51503.003.002-Erion-Oswald vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3W861702.004.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4E646201.005.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
5×WA57500.006.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 4-Sayre-Garvey

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
5 4 2
J 5
K J 10 6 3
K 4 3
Q 10 7
Q 6
A Q
A Q 10 8 7 5
N
WE
S
K J 9 6 3
K 9
9 7 5 2
J 9
8
16    8
8
A 8
A 10 8 7 4 3 2
8 4
6 2

EW 3; NS 3; EW 3; NS 1; Par −100: NS 4×−1

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4SA44206.000.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
4EA−31505.001.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3S431404.002.002-Erion-Oswald vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
4WJ−1503.003.005-Banker-Leese vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3WJ31102.004.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4WJ41300.505.504-Levesque-Thurber vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
4WJ41300.505.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 1-Ho-Widhu

When the hand was played in 3, the opening lead could not have been the 4. If anyone can correct this, let Robert or me know.


Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A
Q 6 2
J 7 6 5 3
K J 8 3
Q 6 4 2
9 7
K 9 8 4 2
10 7
N
WE
S
K 10 9 8 5
A 10 4 3
Q
9 5 2
11
5    9
15
J 7 3
K J 8 5
A 10
A Q 6 4

NS 5; NS 3; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; Par +600

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4×S247906.000.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
4S246205.001.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTS436004.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3NTS4−11002.004.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3NTS2−11002.004.002-Erion-Oswald vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTS4−11002.004.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
3EA31400.006.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 1-Ho-Widhu

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
K J
J 8 7 4
K 5 4
A 5 4 2
Q 8 6 2
K Q
10 9 6
Q J 10 6
N
WE
S
9 7 5
10 6 5 2
Q 8 7
K 9 3
12
10    5
13
A 10 4 3
A 9 3
A J 3 2
8 7

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 4; NS 4; NS 3; Par +630

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3NTN536004.002.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3NTN936004.002.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3NTS1036004.002.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3NTSQ36004.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3NTSQ36004.002.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
3NTN3−11001.005.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTN6−22000.006.002-Erion-Oswald vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K
10
A K J 6 3
A K Q 8 5 3
A Q 7 6 3
9 7 6 3
10 2
J 2
N
WE
S
J 9 5
K J 8 4 2
Q 9 4
7 6
20
7    7
6
10 8 4 2
A Q 5
8 7 5
10 9 4

NS 4N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 1; EW 1; Par +430

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6N469206.000.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3NTS644305.001.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
5N264204.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
5N954002.503.502-Erion-Oswald vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
5N254002.503.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4N251501.005.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
6N4−1500.006.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A K 8 6 5
A 6 4 3
10 6
K 3
Q 10 9 7 3
K 9 8 2
3
9 8 2
N
WE
S
2
10 7 5
A K Q J 9 7
A 10 7
14
5    14
7
J 4
Q J
8 5 4 2
Q J 6 5 4

EW 1N; W 2; EW 1; E 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3EQ−21006.000.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3EJ−1504.002.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3E4−1504.002.005-Banker-Leese vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3EQ−1504.002.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
2EJ2902.004.002-Erion-Oswald vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
2EJ31101.005.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NA−33000.006.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 1-Ho-Widhu

The opening lead of the 4 (low from doubletons) indicates that the declarer in 3 was East. It has been corrected.


Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
9 7 4 3
K Q 9 6
7
10 8 5 2
A K Q 2
A 3 2
A K Q 8 5
9
N
WE
S
10 6 5
J 10 5 4
4 3 2
A Q 3
5
22    7
6
J 8
8 7
J 10 9 6
K J 7 6 4

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 4; NS 1; Par −630

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7E6−33006.000.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
5E8−22005.001.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4EJ−11003.502.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3NTW7−11003.502.505-Banker-Leese vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3NTE836001.504.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
3NTE636001.504.502-Erion-Oswald vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3NTE856600.006.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 1-Ho-Widhu

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q 8 7 4 3
8
Q J 4
A K 10 5
10
A Q 9 6 3
K 9 7 3
Q J 3
N
WE
S
K 9 5
10 7 5 4
10 5
9 8 6 4
12
12    3
13
A J 6 2
K J 2
A 8 6 2
7 2

S 5N; NS 5; N 4N; S 4; S 4; N 3; N 3; EW 1; Par +460

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6N1069806.000.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
4SQ44203.502.502-Erion-Oswald vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
4N1044203.502.504-Levesque-Thurber vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4N1044203.502.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
4N1044203.502.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4N10−1500.505.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
5N4−1500.505.505-Banker-Leese vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 3
Q 9 6
A J 6 4
J 9 3
6 5
10 8 3
10 9 5
A K 7 5 4
N
WE
S
A J 9 8
J 2
Q 8 3
Q 10 8 2
11
7    10
12
Q 7 4 2
A K 7 5 4
K 7 2
6

N 3; NS 3; S 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4N846205.920.083-Huntington-Rivard vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
AVE+AVE+3.603.606-Leblanc-Schulte vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
2SA31403.582.424-Levesque-Thurber vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
2SA31403.582.425-Banker-Leese vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3SA31403.582.427-Singer-Vaidya vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4SA−11001.254.752-Erion-Oswald vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
4SA−22000.085.921-Rogoff-Nason vs 4-Sayre-Garvey

This board was fouled the last time it was played, resulting in the two AVE+ scores. One hand had 14 cards and one 12. I fixed the hand record by transposing the A and the 7 but the heart spot is a guess. If anyone remembers it being a different card, let Robert or me know.


Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
9 7 3 2
5 3
Q 10 3
K J 8 4
J 4
A Q J 8 7 6
J
Q 10 9 2
N
WE
S
Q 10 8
10 9 4 2
K 9 8 5
6 3
6
11    5
18
A K 6 5
K
A 7 6 4 2
A 7 5

NS 4; EW 2; NS 3; NS 3; NS 1N; Par +420

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4N1054506.000.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
2SJ41704.501.505-Banker-Leese vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2SA41704.501.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
2SJ31402.503.502-Erion-Oswald vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3N1031402.503.504-Levesque-Thurber vs 1-Ho-Widhu
4S9−1500.505.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
3SA−1500.505.503-Huntington-Rivard vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A K 9 7
K 2
5 3 2
K 7 6 2
Q
A Q J
K Q J 8 7 4
A 9 3
N
WE
S
J 10 8
10 9 6 3
9 6
Q 10 5 4
13
19    3
5
6 5 4 3 2
8 7 5 4
A 10
J 8

EW 2N; NS 2; W 3; E 2; W 2; EW 1; E 1; Par −120

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3N931405.001.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3N931405.001.005-Banker-Leese vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2SK31405.001.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
1EJ2903.003.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
1WK31101.504.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
2WK31101.504.502-Erion-Oswald vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
4WA41300.006.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette

Declarer was recorded as East when the hand was played in 4. The opening A lead would then be impossible. Declarer has been corrected to West.


Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 3
K Q 10 2
A K 10 9 7 2
Q
Q 9 6 4
J 9 6
8 6
A K 3 2
N
WE
S
A J 10 8 2
A 8 7 4
5 4
9 8
17
10    9
4
7 5
5 3
Q J 3
J 10 7 6 5 4

EW 3; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1N; NS 2; Par −140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3N931106.000.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
4EQ−1505.001.005-Banker-Leese vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2EQ21104.002.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
3EQ31402.004.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
3EQ31402.004.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 1-Ho-Widhu
3EQ31402.004.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3N9−33000.006.002-Erion-Oswald vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
9
K 10 9 7 6 2
K 5 4
A 5 2
Q 8 3 2
4
A Q J 9 8 7
10 9
N
WE
S
A K 10 6 5 4
A 8 5
2
J 8 3
10
9    12
9
J 7
Q J 3
10 6 3
K Q 7 6 4

EW 5; EW 2N; NS 2; EW 3; Par −650

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6EK−11005.500.505-Banker-Leese vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
6NK−11005.500.507-Singer-Vaidya vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
4EQ46202.503.501-Rogoff-Nason vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4E346202.503.502-Erion-Oswald vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
4EQ46202.503.504-Levesque-Thurber vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
4E646202.503.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
4E777100.006.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr

This hand appears to be a Bridgemate scoring error, which is theoreticallly impossible. 6 down one not vulnerable is -50, not -100. It makes no difference to the matchpoint scores but I'd love to know how it happened. It's also impossible for the opening lead to be the K if declarer is East.


Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
K J 6
K 4 3
A Q 9 6 4 2
9
A 8 7 5 3
A 5
10 7 3
A K 4
N
WE
S
J 10 9 8 6
K J 8
J 10 8 7 5
13
15    6
6
Q 10 9 4 2
Q 7 2
5
Q 6 3 2

EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2W9−33006.000.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
4W9−22005.001.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell
2NTW6−11004.002.002-Erion-Oswald vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
2NJ2903.003.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
3W931402.004.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
2NJ−22001.005.006-Leblanc-Schulte vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
3×NJ−25000.006.005-Banker-Leese vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
8 7
K 9 8 7 6 5
A 7
A 6 4
K Q 5 4 3
A 10 3
K 10 6
J 5
N
WE
S
A J 9 2
Q J 4 2
Q 9 5
K 8
11
13    13
3
10 6
J 8 4 3 2
Q 10 9 7 3 2

EW 3; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1N; Par −100: NS 4×−1

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3NTE10−21005.500.502-Erion-Oswald vs 4-Sayre-Garvey
4W5−21005.500.506-Leblanc-Schulte vs 5-Arsenault-Dangel
4W9−1504.002.007-Singer-Vaidya vs 7-Fucile-Gaudette
5SK−21003.003.005-Banker-Leese vs 3-Thomas-Ciesluk
4W744201.005.001-Rogoff-Nason vs 2-Yaffe-Letizia
4WA44201.005.003-Huntington-Rivard vs 6-Landis-Provost Sr
4WA44201.005.004-Levesque-Thurber vs 8-Wiegman-Cockrell

The K lead conflicted with declarer being North. I've changed it to South.The 5 contract was the result of a NS misunderstanding that EW decided to leave alone. Hard to believe it got an average score.